Brubru Deep Dive Library
EU Digital Networks Act
Try Brubru Free

Digital Networks Act: Rewiring Europe's Telecoms

The most ambitious overhaul of EU telecoms regulation in two decades. From spectrum reform to copper switch-off, from satellite authorisation to a single market passport: one regulation to replace 27 national frameworks.

COM(2026) 16 2026/0013(COD) 21 January 2026 Legislative Train
8
Parts in the regulation
€148B
Fibre investment needed
2035
Copper switch-off deadline
27→1
National regulators to single passport
Contents

1. Why the DNA?

Europe's connectivity gap and the case for a single telecoms market

EECC fragmentation

The European Electronic Communications Code (Directive 2018/1972) was transposed into 27 different national frameworks, with full transposition completed only in August 2024. This fragmentation prevents scale, discourages cross-border investment, and keeps European telecoms operators far smaller than their American and Asian counterparts. The Draghi Report on EU competitiveness identified telecoms consolidation as a strategic priority.

The EU connectivity gap
MetricEUUnited StatesChina
FTTH coverage77.2%51%N/A
5G standalone coverage63%81%N/A
Full 5G take-up2%24%77%

Despite strong fibre deployment, EU 5G adoption remains critically low. The Digital Decade targets for 2030 require gigabit connectivity for all households and 5G coverage in all populated areas, goals that the current fragmented framework cannot deliver.

2. Copper Switch-Off

Mandatory migration from copper to fibre by 2035

The DNA establishes a binding framework for decommissioning legacy copper networks. Operators must notify the national regulatory authority (NRA) and affected access seekers at least 36 months before switch-off. Alternative fibre or wireless infrastructure must be available at the point of decommissioning. Spain and Norway have already begun copper phase-out programmes. Full copper switch-off must be completed by 2039 at the latest, with the primary deadline set at 2035 for most networks.

36m
Notification
Operator notifies NRA + access seekers
18m
Migration
Alternative infrastructure available
2035
Primary deadline
Most networks decommissioned
2039
Final deadline
All copper fully decommissioned

3. Spectrum Revolution

From short national licences to unlimited EU-wide authorisations

Unlimited duration licences

The DNA replaces short-term national spectrum licences with authorisations of unlimited duration, subject to a minimum term of 40 years. This gives operators the investment certainty needed for large-scale network rollout. The Commission gains a veto power over national spectrum decisions that could fragment the single market.

"Use it or share it" principle

Spectrum holders who fail to deploy within a reasonable timeframe must make unused spectrum available to other operators. The Commission will adopt binding spectrum roadmaps setting out harmonised timelines for the assignment and use of key frequency bands across all Member States.

4. Satellite Authorisation

Centralised EU licensing for satellite communications

The DNA creates a centralised EU authorisation regime for satellite operators. Instead of obtaining separate licences in each Member State, a satellite operator will apply to the Commission, which manages all stages of the authorisation process. Non-compliance may result in fines of up to 5% of global turnover. The Radio Spectrum Policy Board (RSPB) and the Office for Digital Networks (ODN) will support the Commission in this process.

5. Network Resilience and Cybersecurity

High-risk supplier phase-out and Union preparedness

High-risk supplier (HRS) phase-out

Part II of the DNA formalises the phase-out of high-risk suppliers from European networks. This primarily targets Huawei and ZTE equipment, with an estimated replacement cost of EUR 3.4 to 4.3 billion per year. Mobile network operators will have a 3-year timeline to remove HRS equipment from their core and radio access networks. The rules align with the Cybersecurity Act 2 (CSA2) framework.

Union Preparedness Plan

BEREC will develop a Union Preparedness Plan for electronic communications networks, coordinating resilience measures across Member States. This includes cyber incident response protocols, supply chain diversification requirements, and emergency communication fallback systems.

6. Single Passport

One authorisation to operate across all 27 Member States

The DNA replaces 27 separate national authorisation regimes with a single EU-wide general authorisation, or "single passport". Operators will register once with the Office for Digital Networks (ODN), which maintains a central database of all authorised providers. The approach follows a maximum list principle: the conditions attached to the general authorisation are exhaustively defined at EU level, preventing Member States from adding additional national requirements.

7. Market Regulation

SMP regulation, EU-harmonised access, and FTTH unbundling

Significant Market Power (SMP) regime

The DNA maintains a sequential approach to SMP regulation: national regulatory authorities first assess whether an operator holds significant market power, then impose proportionate remedies. The Commission's veto power is expanded to cover not only proposed market definitions but also proposed remedies. A new EU-harmonised access product will standardise wholesale access conditions across Member States.

FTTH unbundling and symmetric regulation

The regulation introduces provisions for fibre unbundling, allowing alternative operators to access the last mile of fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) networks. Symmetric regulation may be imposed on all operators regardless of market power where justified by specific bottleneck situations, such as access to in-building wiring or ducts.

8. Net Neutrality and Big Tech

Open internet preserved, network slicing enabled, voluntary conciliation for traffic generators

Net neutrality retained

The DNA preserves the core principles of the Open Internet Regulation (2015/2120). All internet traffic continues to be treated equally, with no paid prioritisation for consumer internet access services. Network slicing is explicitly permitted for B2B specialised services, allowing operators to offer guaranteed quality-of-service levels for enterprise applications.

Traffic generators: voluntary conciliation

The DNA does NOT introduce a mandatory "fair share" contribution from large traffic generators (such as streaming platforms). Instead, it creates a voluntary conciliation mechanism through which telecoms operators and content providers can negotiate commercial agreements on traffic management and infrastructure investment. This represents a compromise following intense lobbying from both sides.

9. Consumer Protection

Maximum harmonisation, anti-fraud measures, and modernised emergency access

Maximum harmonisation

Unlike the EECC directive, which allowed Member States to maintain higher consumer protection standards, the DNA adopts a maximum harmonisation approach. This means consumer rights and obligations are defined at EU level and Member States cannot deviate from them. Anti-fraud measures are centralised via the ODN, including a shared database of known fraudulent numbers and calling patterns.

Emergency access modernised

Emergency services access is extended to internet-based communications services such as WhatsApp, ensuring that emergency calls can be made through number-independent interpersonal communications services. The universal service obligation (USO) is streamlined and adapted to the fibre era, removing outdated references to public payphones and printed directories.

10. Governance

New institutions: RSPB, ODN, and a broadened BEREC mandate

BodyReplacesFunction
RSPBRSPG (Radio Spectrum Policy Group)Advisory body on spectrum policy, elevated to formal Board status with binding recommendations
ODNBEREC OfficeCentral database for single passport, satellite authorisation support, anti-fraud coordination, market data collection
BERECBEREC (expanded)Broadened mandate including cybersecurity coordination, Union Preparedness Plan, and enhanced SMP market analysis role

EP Prior Position

Resolution P10_TA(2026)0022 on technological sovereignty (22 January 2026)

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on digital infrastructure and technological sovereignty setting out its priorities ahead of the DNA proposal. Key paragraphs called for a progressive copper switch-off with adequate transition support, increased 5G and 6G investment incentives, harmonised spectrum assignment across the EU, common EU licences for satellite communications, and a binding high-risk vendor toolbox making the voluntary 5G toolbox legally enforceable. The resolution also urged the Commission to avoid a mandatory "fair share" mechanism for traffic generators.

Stakeholder Reactions

Industry and expert positions on the DNA proposal

StakeholderPosition
FTTH Council EuropeBroadly supportive; welcomes copper switch-off framework and fibre investment incentives; cautions against weakening unbundling obligations
Connect Europe (ETNO)Supports single passport and spectrum reform; disappointed by absence of mandatory fair share from traffic generators; welcomes HRS phase-out timeline
GSMAWelcomes unlimited spectrum duration and reduced regulatory burden; concerned about Commission veto on national spectrum decisions; supports satellite licensing simplification
MVNO EuropeStrongly supports symmetric regulation and FTTH unbundling; warns that maximum harmonisation could eliminate favourable national consumer protections; calls for robust wholesale access safeguards
Deutsche TelekomWelcomes investment certainty from long spectrum licences; concerned about HRS replacement costs and tight timeline; supports single passport to reduce administrative burden
Orange / iliadSupports copper switch-off acceleration; critical of voluntary conciliation mechanism as insufficient; calls for stronger fair share provisions; welcomes fibre unbundling clarity
CERREIndependent think tank; notes tension between harmonisation and national market specificities; recommends phased implementation to avoid regulatory shocks; positive on spectrum reform direction
OxeraEconomic consultancy; analysis finds EUR 3.4 to 4.3 billion annual cost for HRS removal; questions whether 3-year timeline is realistic for full network replacement

ITRE Exchange of Views (28 January 2026)

Structured dialogue with Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen on the DNA and the Cybersecurity Act, one week after publication

One week after tabling the proposal, Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen presented the Digital Networks Act and the parallel Cybersecurity Act to ITRE in a 50-minute exchange of views. This was a Commission presentation and question-and-answer session, not a rapporteur's report: the ITRE rapporteur, Renew's Michał Kobosko, was appointed four weeks later, on 26 February 2026. On the DNA, Virkkunen stressed a single regulation replacing four telecoms instruments; a single authorisation passport for operators active in several Member States; stronger EU coordination of spectrum, with priority for operators that invest and unlimited-duration licences for long-term certainty; an EU-level satellite authorisation; a copper switch-off beginning in 2030 and mandatory after 2035 except where fibre is not feasible; removal of reporting and most business-to-business authorisations; and a new EU Preparedness Plan, with the BEREC office becoming the Office for Digital Networks. She described the file as "around 200 articles and 400 recitals" and tied it to the revised Cybersecurity Act (a mandatory 5G toolbox, a strengthened ENISA and ICT supply-chain de-risking).

Positions raised by political groups

Speaker / groupPosition and questions
Michał Kobosko
Renew (now ITRE rapporteur)
Called the DNA "the biggest elephant in the room" and "a long-awaited reform of the sector... crucial for the future of European economy and security". Welcomed the single passport, Europeanised spectrum licences, faster copper switch-off and stronger EU-level governance, and pledged to help convince the Council. Argued digital sovereignty should run through all Commission proposals, not only the spring tech-sovereignty package, and pointed to Parliament's own technological-sovereignty report. Asked what will be hardest in the Council negotiations.
Matthias Ecke
S&D (shadow)
Welcomed the ambition, the choice of a regulation over a directive, and keeping ex-ante regulation to deepen the single market "but not to create local monopolies". Pressed three points: the voluntary interconnection and dispute mechanism must not drift into a de-facto network-access or fee system that harms consumers or net neutrality; missing recitals could weaken net neutrality and undercut CJEU case law and BEREC guidelines; and a stronger Commission interpretation and enforcement role must not erode the independence of national regulators and of BEREC.
Pilar Del Castillo Vera
EPP (shadow)
Focused on ex-ante regulation, citing Articles 69 and 83 on when national regulators may intervene in cases of market failure or significant market power. Noted that the ex-ante regime does not disappear but is changed, and asked the Commission to spell out how the changes benefit investment in connectivity.
Markéta Gregorová
Greens/EFA
Framed cybersecurity as a foreign-policy question: compliance alone does not capture risks from foreign-state influence (ownership structures, extraterritorial legislation, governmental control). Asked how to strengthen European industry without entrenching incumbent global vendors and oligopolies, and whether geopolitical-risk criteria for third-country government control will be included (referring to "one specific country").
Other interventions
(EPP, ECR, S&D)
EPP speakers raised the investment ramp-up timeline and how progress will be measured, the institutional capacity of the new Office for Digital Networks and BEREC, and standardisation and interoperability to let EU cloud, open-source and cybersecurity offers rival US hyperscalers (citing the 3GPP telecoms model). An ECR member (speaking in Spanish) argued that sovereignty "is not something you can declare, you have to build it", seeking concrete anti-fragmentation obligations, protection of national-regulator competences and cybersecurity duties proportionate for small administrations. Further interventions pressed for safeguards so European-owned companies and consumers benefit from market opening, clarity on how the DNA interacts with the forthcoming Cloud and AI Development Act, and faster dispute resolution. S&D's Elisabetta Gualmini was listed but absent.

Commission replies. Virkkunen said first Council feedback on the package was "quite positive", and that the hardest DNA issue will be the very different situations and cultures across Member States (city centres versus remote areas). On investment she pointed to harmonised spectrum rules, investor priority and unlimited licences, and the single passport. On interconnection and net neutrality she said broad consultations showed the market "is working well", so the Commission will not regulate business-to-business contracts but offers a voluntary mechanism plus EU guidelines as a backstop, while keeping the net-neutrality principle and adapting it to 5G and 6G network slicing. On ex-ante she confirmed the general architecture and symmetric access are kept but updated to support fibre through in-house-wiring access. On security she set out NIS2-sector risk assessments (connected cars, energy and solar inverters, medical devices), a mandatory 5G toolbox with a three-year transition that excludes high-risk vendors from key 5G parts, and case-by-case mitigations (including data localisation) paired with impact assessments. She flagged the spring tech-sovereignty package (Cloud and AI Development Act, CHIPS Act 2, open-source strategy) as the next ITRE workstream.

Source: ITRE committee meeting of 28 January 2026 (14:30), agenda item 19, structured dialogue. EP Multimedia webstream (DNA segment from 16:38).

Legislative Timeline

Key milestones in the Digital Networks Act

February 2024
Commission white paper: "How to master Europe's digital infrastructure needs"
July 2025
Call for evidence on Digital Networks Act closed
21 January 2026
Commission proposal: COM(2026) 16 (DNA) + COM(2026) 35 (EECC review) + SWD(2026) 14 (impact assessment)
22 January 2026
EP Resolution on technological sovereignty (P10_TA(2026)0022)
28 January 2026
ITRE structured dialogue with Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen: exchange of views on the Digital Networks Act and the Cybersecurity Act, one week after publication (no rapporteur appointed yet at this stage).
26 February 2026
ITRE rapporteur appointed: Michał Kobosko (Renew, Poland). Shadows confirmed: Pilar Del Castillo Vera (EPP), Matthias Ecke (S&D), Mélanie Disdier (PfE), Francesco Torselli (ECR), Damian Boeselager (Greens/EFA), Jussi Saramo (The Left). Opinion committee LIBE (rapporteur Ana Vasconcelos, Renew, appointed 2 March 2026). BUDG declined to issue an opinion.
March 2026
EPRS briefing PE 785.672. The Commission presented the proposal to the Council; the Telecommunications and Information Society Working Party began examining it.
Monday 27 April 2026
Committee referral announced in Parliament (1st reading) per OEIL Key Events. Status set to awaiting committee decision.
As of 24 June 2026
LIBE draft opinion tabled (24 June 2026): the opinion committee LIBE tabled its draft opinion on the Digital Networks Act (PE789.917, rapporteur Ana Vasconcelos, Renew). The lead committee ITRE has not yet tabled its draft report; the file remains in committee per OEIL. Earlier, IMCO opinion rapporteur Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew) was appointed on 8 May 2026, and the Czech Chamber of Deputies filed a national-parliament contribution on COM(2026) 16 on 21 May 2026.